THE GREATER RISK?

There is so much talk of Obama’s questionable connections with Ayers, Khalidis, Pflegers, Wrights, ACORNs, etc. I don’t know what the truth it and what to believe. One thing is sure that there are questions and if elected this would be the first time in history the President of the United States has been accused of being associated with terrorists.

The Obama campaign has been trying to paint McCain as Bush’s third term. Whether you agree with McCain’s policies or not one thing is sure; McCain is anything but Bush’s third term. Remember 2000, Immigration reform, campaign finance, prisoner abuse to name just a few. But for the sake of the argument, let’s say McCain may be continuing some of Bush’s policies. Here is your choice.

You have a candidate who we don’t really know much about who may or may not be linked and associated with terrorists versus a candidate whose life and record is an open book who may or may not continue with some of Bush’s policies.

What would you rather risk?

OBAMA'S EXECUTIVE EXPERIENCE

According to the records released by the University of Illinois, After Walter Annenberg’s foundation offered several hundred million dollars to American public schools in the mid-’90s, William Ayers applied for $50 million for Chicago. The purpose of his application was to secure funds to “raise political consciousness” in Chicago’s public schools. After he won the grant, Ayers’s group chose Barack Obama to distribute the money. Between 1995 and 1999, Obama distributed the $50 million and raised another $60 million from other civic groups to augment it. In doing so, he was following Ayers’s admonition to grant the funds to “external” organizations, like American Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) to pair with schools and conduct programs to radicalize the students and politicize them. Reading, math and science achievement tests counted for little in the CAC grants, but the school’s success in preaching a radical political agenda determined how much money they got.